I filed a lawsuit against a Shelter Insured in December of 2016. My client had 20K in medical expenses and the insurance company offered me 3.5K. I sued them. They called back and offered 7K of their 25K policy. A few weeks ago their lawyer called me up asking if I would take 15K of the 25K policy if she could get Shelter to pay it. I told her no and my client was owed the entire policy. On Monday I received an email letting me know they were tendering the entire policy.
There is a real problem if you are an insurance adjuster attempting to pay 3.5K on a case that eventually gets resolved for 25K. Nothing changed as far as damages and it isn't the first time I have dealt with this adjuster. Three months ago I resolved a case in litigation for 40K after the adjuster offered me 14K pre-suit.
Now every time I see this adjuster on a file I'm filing a lawsuit. She has lost all credibility and I feel bad for her insureds. Rant over.
Advertising Material.
www.louisville-injury-lawyer.com
Thursday, January 25, 2018
Thursday, January 4, 2018
Your "Bulldog" Lawyer Is Terrible
I have a client that was referred to me by a lawyer in
As I was initially discussing the case
with my new client she told me that she hired the Florida Lawyer because he was a
"bulldog" negotiator (he doesn't advertise as so and is a really nice guy/well respected lawyer). She had seen him negotiate a real estate
contract in Florida
and thought he did a good job. I guarantee the Florida Lawyer did do a good
job on that case...at that time in that manner with that opposing counsel.
As a result of the bulldog
negotiation on the Florida real estate contract the client wanted the same type
of scorched earth, yell loud, "really give it to the insurance
company lawyer" stance from me. This got me to thinking about whether or
not it’s helpful to be a jerk as a lawyer. It isn't.
This does not mean that a
lawyer should lie down or refuse to negotiate in a tactful, strong willed
manner. If I have a disagreement with another lawyer I'm going to state
my case. I'm not going to bend or move off what I believe to be correct
and true.
What it does mean is that
calling up the defense lawyer and yelling at him about the value of a case and
demanding he pay now or "face the consequences" is a complete waste
of time.
Think about it this way: Do you
respond positively to people that are absurd, rude, loud, or
unreasonable? Will you listen to someone and give in if they yell louder
than you? If your answer to the latter is yes, please don't become a
lawyer :)
I can think of one lawyer
working the defense bar that is a real piece of work. His emails are
borderline comical with the absurdity. They are basically just threats
without any backing. I've asked him before if his emails are really his
emails or if he is showing off for his clients. He won't give me a
straight answer. I've basically stopped responding to him unless I have
to and I'm more inclined to fight him because he is a jerk (maybe I have a tint
of spitefulness). His “bulldog” attitude
harms his clients.
I understand, it’s a marketing
gimmick to argue you are a "bulldog" lawyer. I have a feeling that a lot of the lawyers advertising like this really don't act like it. Yet, there is a certain
type of client that buys into this nonsense. Here is a question for that
type of client: What makes you think your bulldog lawyer isn't going to bully
you into taking less on your case? Does being a jerk only apply to
others?
In this case, I know the lawyer
on the other side. A "bulldog" lawyer isn't going to
work. Opposing counsel isn't a jerk and if I start yelling at him he's
going to think I'm crazy. I'm going to negotiate with him
in a tactful manner without being a jerk. This will lead to the best result for my client.
Advertising Material for www.louisville-injury-lawyer.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)